28/10/2005
EU tables new offer in Doha World Trade talks
This
week the EU has tabled new proposals on agriculture and other
areas of the DDA trade talks to its negotiating partners
in the "Five Interested Parties" (FIPs). The European
Union recognises that agricultural negotiations have now entered
a critical phase and these proposals represent a comprehensive,
substantive and credible contribution. The EU proposals bridge
the different proposals tabled by other WTO Members. These
proposals must unlock immediate progress in other areas of
the Doha negotiations, particularly, trade in industrial products
and services, which are crucial to the European economy. The
EU proposals are fully conditional on satisfactory movement
in other areas of the negotiation. The cuts offered are within
the European Commission’s mandate.
The EU’s proposals will allow WTO Members to converge
on the middle ground in agriculture negotiations. The cuts proposed
go further than the EU’s original offer and significantly
further than the cuts agreed in the Uruguay Round. More importantly,
the average cut is higher and is more uniformly applied in the
various levels of tariffs. In the Uruguay Round, the highest
tariffs received the lowest cuts. The EU’s new proposal
ensures that the higher the original tariff, the higher the reduction.
The proposal is fully within the current negotiating mandate
given to the Commission. However it is at the outer limit of
that mandate.
EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson
said: "The EU’s
offer is substantial, offering new market access in agriculture
and driving down trade-distorting farm subsidies. We want to
move in a way that is tolerable for the EU’s reforming
agricultural sector, and does not eliminate the preferential
access Europe already offers to some of the world’s poorest
countries. Europe’s major partners need to understand that
this offer is conditional on immediate movement in negotiations
on trade in industrial goods and services as well as in other
areas of the agricultural negotiation. These areas are important
to Europe, and to developing countries and provide the only route
to a balanced Doha outcome."
EU Agriculture Commissioner Mariann
Fischer Boel said: "The
EU has radically reformed its agricultural policy. Today’s
new proposals on tariffs respect our commitment to offer substantial
improvements in market access, without putting those reforms
into question. This is a bold move which will mean big new challenges
for EU farmers. We need to get something in return: real, meaningful
reforms in other developed countries, international recognition
of our Geographical Indications, real curbs on other countries’ trade-distorting
export programmes, and far-reaching offers in other parts of
the negotiation. The Doha Round is about much more than just
agriculture, and others must give as well as take."
The Offer
Conditional on satisfactory movement in other areas, the EU
offer proposes:
· A 60% reduction in the EU’s
highest tariffs. A range of tariff cuts between 35% and 60%
for lower tariffs.
A cut in our average agriculture tariff of 46% - from 22.8% to
12.2%.
·
· A maximum agricultural tariff of 100% - as demanded by developing
countries;
·
· A reduction in the number of sensitive products designated
by the EU;
·
· Reductions in tariffs even for sensitive products - and wider
Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs) for all sensitive products - meaning
more market access;
·
·
A 70% reduction in trade distorting agricultural subsidies
- as agreed in the EU’s 2003 CAP reform, and tighter
disciplines on Blue Box spending;
·
· The total elimination of all agricultural export support by
an agreed date, if others discipline their export support;
·
· Differential treatment for developing countries: higher tariff
bands, lower tariff cuts and a maximum tariff of 150%. No tariff
cuts for the 50 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
·
The Conditionalities
EU proposals in market access are strictly conditional on further
clarification from other developed countries on the elimination
of their forms of export support. US commitments on Food Aid
and Export Credits are not yet sufficient. Australia , Canada
and New Zealand need to provide further commitment on the reform
of their State Trading enterprises. The EU also seeks real disciplines
on the most trade-distorting US farm payments (Counter Cyclical
Payments).
The EU proposals are also strictly conditional on the acceptance
by our negotiating partners of a number of proposals in the negotiating
areas of the DDA outside of agriculture:
· In trade in industrial
goods, the EU wants agreement before Hong Kong on a progressive
formula that cuts into applied
tariffs;
·
· In services, the EU wants to see negotiations complemented
by ambitious mandatory country targets for services sectors
to be liberalised - agreed at Hong Kong;
·
· An international register protecting Geographical Indications
(GIs) in all WTO Member States.
·
· In WTO Rules negotiations, the EU wants the WTO to negotiate
between now and Hong Kong a list of issues to be resolved including
all major impediments to international trade created by abusive
recourse to antidumping
·
· In development, the EU wants assurance that there will be a
range of proposals ready for Hong Kong including a Trade Related
Assistance package, and agreement that all developed countries
should extend tariff and quota free access to all Least Developed
Countries no later than the overall conclusion of the DDA.